公共课2005年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题及参考答案(3)免费考研试题资料试卷-同创考研网

2005年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题及参考答案(3)

来源: 浏览统计:

　　41.　　

　　A.isineviinradicaleducationreforms.

　　B.isbutalltoonaturalinlanguagedevelopment.

　　C.hascausedthecontroversyoverthecounter-culture.

　　D.broughtaboutchangesinpublicattitudesinthe1960s.

　　37.Theword“talking”（Linge6,paragraph3）denotes

　　A.modesty.

　　B.personality.

　　C.liveliness.

　　D.informality.

　　38.TowhichofthefollowingstatementswouldMcWhortermostlikelyagree?

　　A.Logicalthinkingisnotnecessarilyrelatedtothewaywetalk.

　　B.BlackEnglishcanbemoreexpressivethanstandardEnglish.

　　C.Non-standardvarietiesofhumanlanguagearejustasentertaining.

　　D.Ofallthevarieties,standardEnglishCanbestconveycomplexideas.

　　39.ThedescriptionofRussians'loveofmemorizingpoetryshowstheauthor's

　　A.interestintheirlanguage.

　　B.appreciationoftheirefforts.

　　C.admirationfortheirmemory.

　　D.contemptfortheirold-fashionedness.

　　40.Accordingtothelastparagraph,“paperplates”isto“china”as

　　A.“temporary”isto“permanent”.

　　B.“radical”isto“conservative”.

　　C.“functional”isto“artistic”.

　　D.“humble”isto“noble”.

　　PartB

　　Directions：

　　Inthefollowingtext,somesentenceshaveremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuionefromthelistA-Gtofitintoofthenumberedblanktherearetwoextrachoices,whichdonotfitinanyofthegaps.Markyouranswerson

　　ANSWERSHEET1.（10points）

　　Canada'spremiers（theleadersofprovincialgovernments）,iftheyhaveanybreathleftaftercomplainingaboutOttawaattheirlateJulyannualmeeting,mightspareamomenttodosomething,toreducehealth-carecosts.

　　They'reallgroaningaboutsoaringhealthbudgets,thefastest-growingcomponentofwhicharepharmaceuticalcosts.

　　Whattodo?BoththeRomanowcommissionandtheKirbycommitteeonhealthcare-tosaynothingofreportsfromotherexpertsrecommendedthecreationofanationaldrugagency.Insteadofeachprovincehavingitsownlistofapproveddrugs,bureaucracy,proceduresandlimitedbargainingpower,allwouldpoolresources,workwithOttawa,andcreateanationalinstitution.

　　But“national”doesn'thavetomeanthat.“National”couldmeaninterprovincial-provincescombiningeffortstocreateonebody.

　　Eitherway,onebenefitofa“national”organizationwouldbetonegotiatebetterprices,ifpossible,withdrugmanufacturers.Insteadofhavingoneprovince-oraseriesofhospitalswithinaprovince-negotiateapriceforagivendrugontheprovinciallist,thenationalagencywouldnegotiateonbehalfofallprovinces.

　　Ratherthan,say,Quebec,negotiatingonbehalfofsevenmillionpeople,thenationalagencywouldnegotiateonbehalf31millionpeople.Basiceconomicssuggeststhegreaterthepotentialconsumers,thehigherthelikelihoodofabetterprice.

　　AsmallstephasbeentakeninthedirectionofanationalagencywiththecreationoftheCanadianCo-ordinatingOfficeforHealthTechnologyAssessment,fundedbyOttawaandtheprovinces.Underit,aCommonDrugReviewrecommendstoprovinciallistswhichnewdrugsshouldbeincluded,predictablyandregrettablyQuebecrefusedtojoin.

　　Afewpremiersaresuspiciousofanyfederal-provincialdeal-making.They（particularlyQuebecandAlberta）justwantOttawatoforkoveradditionalbillionswithfew,ifany,stringsattached.That'sonereasonwhytheideaofanationalisthasn'tgoneanywherewhiledrugcostskeeprisingfast.